Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Ranking methodology

Firms on Magento Technical Audit Companies Bulletin are scored against eight published evidence criteria: Adobe Commerce depth, audit breadth, rescue and stabilization fit, B2B and ERP complexity, public proof, method transparency, delivery fit, and governance. Named delivery evidence ranks above a documented service capability. The full weighting is published on the ranking page.

Ownership and funding

This site is published by B2B TechSelect. We do not accept payment from vendors to appear in, or influence the position of, our rankings. See About for more on how the site is operated.

Conflicts of interest

This publication is part of an Elogic Commerce-owned microsite network. B2B TechSelect and Nina Kavulia remain the named publisher and author identities, but their bylines do not make the ranking independent of Elogic Commerce ownership. See the author page for the author-level disclosure.

Sourcing and vendor claims

Every performance figure attributed to a vendor is sourced and linked to the vendor’s own publication or a third-party directory such as Clutch, G2, or the Adobe Solution Partner directory. We label first-party statements as such and distinguish them from independently verifiable evidence, so readers can weigh each claim themselves.

Use of AI

AI tools are used to assist with research aggregation, drafting, and page production on this site. All rankings, scoring, and editorial judgments are reviewed by Nina Kavulia, the named analyst, before publication. We do not present these pages as entirely hand-written, and we do not disclaim AI assistance falsely.

Corrections

If a vendor claim, score, or credential on this site is inaccurate or outdated, contact us with the specific page and detail. We review and correct verified errors and note significant corrections with an updated revision date.